Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHHOTEY LAL AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Chhotey Lal And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18094 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14764 (30 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Chhotey lal and Umesh Chandra Rathore   indicted in case crime No.180  of 2006  under sections  7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act  P.S. Mussorie  District Ghaziabad.

Heard Smt. Raj Lakshmi Sinha, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that there is no evidence of giving and taking of bribe against the applicants. The learned counsel pointed out that illegal gratification was taken by  constable  Raj Kumar and recovery of  Rs. 500/- received as bribe was made from his possession.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicants and co-accused Raj Kumar were on picked duty and were seen demanding and taking illegal gratification from vehicle owners.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

There is no evidence of giving and taking of bribe against the applicants and mere recovery of Rs. 60 and 75 respectively from the possession of the applicants is not incriminating. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicants Chhotey lal and Umesh Chandra Rathore   indicted in case crime No.180  of 2006  under sections  7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act  P.S. Mussorie  District Ghaziabad. , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/18094/06

30.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.