High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Gulabh Chandra And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4930 of 2006  RD-AH 14781 (30 August 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the judgment in question.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that marriage of Smt. Amrawati Devi with appellant Gulab Chandra took place in the year 1980 and as such, there was no question of demanding any dowry in the year 1993. Admittedly, Gulab Chandra, who is husband of the deceased, was studying at Allahabad and was present here at the time of death of his wife. Both the appellants were on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
After having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and all facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that both the appellants, who are father and son, are entitled to be released on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellants-Gulab Chandra and Jokhoo be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Basti in S.T. No. 186 of 1994 State Vs. Gulab Chand and others.
If each of the appellants deposits a sum of Rs.4000/- as fine within one-month from today in the court below, the recovery of the remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.