High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Details
PANCHO versus STATE OF U.P.
Case Law Search
Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation
Judgement
Pancho v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4929 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14828 (30 August 2006)
|
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned judgment.
Admit.
Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal no. 4645 of 2006.
Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.
It is contended that appellant was armed with lathi. Co-accused Bhagwan Singh was bailed out by this Court on 21.8.2006. The appellant was on bail in the court below and did not misuse the liberty of bail.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to release the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Pancho be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Mathura in S.T. No. 405 of 1996 State Vs. Bhagwan Singh and others.
30.8.2006
OP/4929/06
Copyright
Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites
Advertisement
dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.