Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATISH KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satish Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18089 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14863 (30 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Satish Kumar (C.P.281)   indicted in case crime No. 344  of 2006  under sections 7/13 (1) (d) Prevention of Corruption Act and 120-B, 323, 384  I.P.C. P.S Kavi Nagar.  District Ghaziabad.

Heard Shri Vijay Gautam , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the fictitious recovery has been shown from the possession of the applicant to complete the target. The learned counsel submitted that mere recovery of currency notes is not offensive. According to learned counsel there is no evidence of giving and taking of illegal gratification against the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicant had received  Rs. 500/- from the truck drivers as illegal gratification and  recovery of the said amount has been made from his possession.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of the both the parties and without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Satish Kumar (C.P.281) indicted in case crime No. 344 of 2006  under sections 7/13 (1) (d) Prevention of Corruption Act and 120-B, 323, 384  I.P.C. P.S Kavi Nagar.  District Ghaziabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/18089/06

30.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.