Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DURGA AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Durga And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 17993 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 14944 (31 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and  learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that in the present case the F.I.R. has been lodged on 25.3.2006 at 8.00 a.m. in respect of the incident which had occurred on 24.3.2006 at 11.00 p.m. The distance of the police station was 6 kms from the alleged place of occurrence. The F.I.R. was lodged by the brother of the deceased. In the F.I.R. nobody was named in the F.I.R. as accused, but during investigation the I.O. has recorded the statements of Krishna Gopal  the son of the deceased on the same day who claimed himself to an eye witness. It is contended that if the incident was witnessed by the son of the deceased it would have been immediately disclosed by him and the applicants would have been named in the F.I.R. The naming of the applicants is after thought.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicants Durga and Gopal Ji  involved in Case Crime No. 77 of 2006, under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station , Sheoli District Kanpur Dehat be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two heavy    sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned .

Dt: 31.8.2006

Rcv/17993-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.