Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PRABHAT KUMAR GAUTAM versus UNION BANK OF INDIA

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Prabhat Kumar Gautam v. Union Bank Of India - WRIT - C No. 47609 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15003 (31 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon.R.P.Misra, J.

Hon.Shishir Kumar, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Nigamendra Shukla and Sri Sanjeev Singh Advocate, for the respondent.

Notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the Act) was issued to the petitioner and subsequently a notice under section 13(4) of the Act was also issued to him on 13.1.2006. The petitioner has got an alternative remedy by way of filing an appeal under Section 17 of the Act. In such a situation the writ petition is hereby dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

31.8.2006

SKD/47609/2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.