Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAUKAT versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shaukat v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 18238 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15024 (31 August 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Shaukat   indicted in case crime No.  66 of 2005  under sections 364-A  I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Maduwadih  District Varanasi .

Heard Shri P.K. Singh , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is not named in the First Information Report  and by the victim in his statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.c. According to the learned counsel name of the applicant came to fore from the confessional statement of the co-accused. The learned counsel urged that co-accused Nathuni Singh, Anawar alias Neta, Koleshwar Singh, Santosh alias Munmun and others have been enlarged on bail by the orders of this court and the case of the applicant stands at better footing from that of co-accused.

The learned A.G.A. argued that name of the applicant was disclosed by the co-accused.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of the both the parties and without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Shaukat   indicted in case crime No.  66 of 2005  under sections 364-A  I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Maduwadih  District Varanasi  , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks//18238/06

31.8.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.