Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAFEEQ ANSARI versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rafeeq Ansari v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT TAX No. 1380 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15277 (4 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal, J.

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the recovery of the impugned amount of tax.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent no. 2 within two weeks from today, who shall take a final decision on the said representation in accordance with law within two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before him.

It is made clear that the court has not adjudicated upon the claim on merits. For a period of one month or till the representation is decided, whichever is earlier, the recovery of impugned demand shall remain stayed.

4.9.2006

VKS/ WP1380/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.