Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


C/M Kisan Inter College And Another v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 47402 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15463 (6 September 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


W.P.No. 47402 of 2006

Hon. S.N.Srivastava, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned counsel for the Caveator. I have also heard learned Standing counsel.

In view of the fact that the order passed by the Joint Director Education dated 10.8.2006 according recognition to Sri Ashok Yadav as Manager and his Committee has already been recalled and the record relating to election of the Management Committee of Kisan Inter College, Bhagya Nagar Auraiya has been referred to the Regional Level Committee under the judgment of this Court dated 10th August 2006 passed in writ petition no. 41453 of 2006, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.

However, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated across the bar that on 17th August 2006, Sri Ashok Yadav, who holds the office of President of Samajwadi Party, upon being recognized as Manager of the Institution by the Joint Director Education, withdrew a sum of Rs. 20,000/-. On being queried the learned counsel for the Opposite party minced no words to say that the order passed by this Court on 10.8.2006 was duly communicated to the Opp. Party no.5.

In this view of the matter, it is directed that Sri Ashok Yadav Opp. Party no.5 will deposit the entire amount in the account of the college/society of Kisan Inter College, Bhagya Nagar Auraiya within 15 days from today.

Needless to say that regional Level committee which is seized of the matter, shall decide the matter in accordance with law after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties. The Committee, it is further needless to say, shall assign reasons for the conclusions regard being had to the directions contained in the earlier judgment. The matter may be taken to some finality by the Committee.

Petition is disposed of finally in terms of above directions.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.