Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NANHEY & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Nanhey & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5131 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15484 (6 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Heard.

Admit.

Issue Notice.

Learned counsel for the appellants has contended that the appellants are on interim bail from the trial court after their conviction by judgement and order dated 18.8.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Bareilly in S. T. No. 642 of 2001.

In the circumstances of the case, appellants shall continue on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. They shall also deposit the amount of fine as imposed on them.

Dated: 6.9.2006

RKS/5131/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.