Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SRI AWADHESH KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sri Awadhesh Kumar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 47889 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15514 (6 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. ARUN TANDON, J.

Heard counsel for the parties.

It is admitted to the petitioner that he had initiated original suit proceedings, being Original Suit No. 173 of 1991, for an injunction restraining the employer (Management) from terminating his employment illegally and further to pay salary to the petitioner regularly. In the said suit a temporary injunction was granted in favour of the petitioner on 5th March, 1991 whereunder the petitioner was permitted to continue in employment. It is alleged that the suit has been decreed in favour of the petitioner in the year, 1998. The management has been permanently injuncted from terminating the employment of the petitioner except in accordance with law and further  to make payment of salary regularly. It is further stated that a review application has been filed by the management, which is pending consideration in the said suit proceedings. Now the petitioner alleges that the salary of the petitioner has been stopped, he therefore seeks a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to work as Class-IV employee and to pay salary accordingly.

In the opinion of the Court, writ petition is totally misconceived. The relief, which the petitioner has asked for in the present writ petition, is already subject matter of suit proceedings. The petitioner may be well advised to seek further relief, as may be necessary, in the suit or by such proceedings as may be permissible.

Writ petition is dismissed.  

06.09.2006

Pkb/47889-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.