High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Nazama Parveen v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 49789 of 2006  RD-AH 15775 (11 September 2006)
Court No. 38
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 49789 of 2006
Smt. Nazama Parveen
State of U.P. and others
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Petitioner was appointed as Aanganbari Karyakatri while she was unmarried for center Jat Sanaya, Rampur. Thereafter compliant was made that petitioner is not at all resident of village wherein center in question is situated. On the said complaint being made inquiry was conducted and thereafter service of the petitioner has been sought to be disengaged.
Contention of the petitioner is that entire proceedings undertaken against the petitioner is ex parte as such impugned order dispensing with her service are liable to be quashed.
Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand contended that petitioner was offered appointment when she was unmarried and now she is married staying with her husband, as such once petitioner is not stying at the aforesaid village then the view which has been sought to be taken is correct view and no interference is warranted.
After respective arguments have been advanced. This fact is clearly reflected that petitioner has been offered appointment when she was unmarried. Description of the petitioner reflects that she is married and this position has not been disputed. as such opinion which has been formed cannot be said to be ingenuine or in correct opinion, and opportunity, in no view of the matter could have improved the case of the petitioner that after marriage she has been obliged to her husband place.
Consequently no interference is warranted and writ petition is dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.