Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAVINDRA AGRWAL @ RABBOO versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ravindra Agrwal @ Rabboo v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1094 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1580 (20 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Accused applicant Ravindra Agrawal @ Rabboo has prayed for release on bail in case Crime No. 1266 of 2005 under Sections 387, 307 IPC and Section 12/14 U.P. Dacoity Act, and Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Provision Act and in Case Crime No. 1267 of 2005 under Section 25 Arms Act, P./s. Mau Rani pur, district Jhansi.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Prosecution case is that accused was arrested along with one more person on 24.11.2005 when he and others opened firing at the Police party. However, in the incident no one was injured.

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that accused has been falsely implicated and other co accused have criminal history whereas this applicant has no criminal history. He has further contended that applicant had contested election on that account he has been falsely implicated. He has also contended that even Mewa Ram or any member of his family who are alleged to have fired at by the accused persons also did not receive any injury.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merits of the case, accused is entitled to bail.

Let the applicant named above involved in above noted case Crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. He shall give an undertaking that he will not indulge in any criminal activity and shall neither temper with the prosecution witnesses nor threat the complainant/witnesses.

Dated: 20.1.2006

RKS/1094/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.