SHRI GAURI SHANKER SAHU versus SHRI MAHESH SAHU & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Shri Gauri Shanker Sahu v. Shri Mahesh Sahu & Others - SECOND APPEAL No. 1251 of 1998 [2006] RD-AH 1590 (20 January 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Umeshwar Pandey, J.

List revised

Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None is however present on behalf of the respondents.

The respondent No. 7 is reportedly dead. The application for substitution has been moved but no notice appears to have been sent to the proposed legal representatives nor to the unrepresented respondents. Steps for notice be taken within two weeks and thereafter notices be issued by both ways i.e. R.P.A.D. and ordinary process, to the proposed legal representatives as well as unrepresented respondents returnable within next four weeks.

List thereafter on the date fixed in the notice.

20.01.2006

gp/1251

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.