High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Quadir v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19149 of 2006  RD-AH 15959 (13 September 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Quadir indicted in case crime No. 372 of 2006 under sections 8/20 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Etmaddaula District Agra.
Heard Shri Ram Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of 150 gm. Charas is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. According to learned counsel the compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act was not made. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. The learned counsel urged that there is no criminal history of the applicant.
The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of Charas more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The quantity of Charas has been mentioned in the recovery memo as about 150 gm. The quantity of recovered Charas is below commercial quantity. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Quadir indicted in case crime No. 372 of 2006 under sections 8/20 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Etmaddaula District Agra., be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.