Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SALEEM versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Saleem v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19151 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15971 (13 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Saleem   indicted in case crime No. 566  of 2006  under sections 379, 411, 427  I.P.C.  P.S. Bhuta  District Bareilly.

Heard Shri Aditya Prasad Mishra , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that theft of telephone wire is said to have been committed in July 13, 2006 and recovery was made on 14.8.2006. The learned counsel urged that there are no public witnesses to the recovery and the offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The learned A.G.A. argued that offence of theft of telephone wire is an offence against the society.

The recovery of about 20 Kg. copper wire is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in jail for the last about one month. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. There is no criminal history of the applicant. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Saleem   indicted in case crime No. 566  of 2006  under sections 379, 411, 427  I.P.C.  P.S. Bhuta  District Bareilly , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19151/06

13.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.