Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SARFARAJ AHMAD versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sarfaraj Ahmad v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19155 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 15972 (13 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sarfaraj Ahmad    indicted in case crime No. 2997   of 2006   under sections  8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Katghar   District Moradabad.

Heard Shri Amit Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that compliance of mandatory  provisions of N.D.P.S. Act was not made. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. According to the learned counsel the quantity of contraband seized is less than commercial quantity. The learned counsel contended that there is no criminal history of the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of Heroin more than small quantity was made from the possession of the  applicant

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The quantity of recovered Heorin has been mentioned as about 100 gm. in the recovery memo.  The quantity of recovered Heorin is less than commercial quantity. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Sarfaraj Ahmad    indicted in case crime No. 2997   of 2006   under sections  8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Katghar   District Moradabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19155/06

13.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.