High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Sarfaraj Ahmad v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19155 of 2006  RD-AH 15972 (13 September 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sarfaraj Ahmad indicted in case crime No. 2997 of 2006 under sections 8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Katghar District Moradabad.
Heard Shri Amit Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act was not made. There are no public witnesses to the recovery. According to the learned counsel the quantity of contraband seized is less than commercial quantity. The learned counsel contended that there is no criminal history of the applicant.
The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of Heroin more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The quantity of recovered Heorin has been mentioned as about 100 gm. in the recovery memo. The quantity of recovered Heorin is less than commercial quantity. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Sarfaraj Ahmad indicted in case crime No. 2997 of 2006 under sections 8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. Katghar District Moradabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.