Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AJIM versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ajim v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19216 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16006 (14 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ajim    indicted in case crime No. 118   of 2006   under sections  8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. G.R.P   District Firozabad.

Heard Shri Kamal Dev Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of 60 gm. Dizapam Powder is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel argued that the compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act was not made by the searching officer.

The learned A.G.A. argued that there is criminal history of case under section 302 I.P.C. against the applicant and recovery of Dizapam Powder more than small quantity was made from the possession of the  applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The quantity of Dizapom Powder has been mentioned in the recovery memo as about 60 gm. The quantity of recovered Dizapam Powder was not weighed on scales. The quantity of recovered contraband is below commercial quantity.  In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Ajim    indicted in case crime No. 118   of 2006   under sections  8/22 N.D.P.S. Act P.S. G.R.P   District Firozabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19216/06

14.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.