KHURSHID AHMED versus THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Khurshid Ahmed v. The Chief Election Commissioner And Others - WRIT - C No. 51123 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16037 (14 September 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.

Petitioner has performed certain election work. According to the petitioner the entire money was not paid to him. He had earlier filed writ petition No. 8319 of 1999 which was disposed with the direction  to decide the representation of the  petitioner. The representation of the petitioner has been decided on 10.7.2006. Hence, the present writ petition.

We have heard counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.N.Rai, counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner representation has been rejected on the ground of over payment to him.

Petitioner may, if so advised, file a Suit for recovery of the money.

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt.14.9.2006

Rkb.51123/06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.