Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANIL PAL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anil Pal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19249 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16106 (15 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

The Bail Application No. 19249 of 2006 in case crime no. 156 of 2006 under section 387 I.P.C. and Bail Application No. 19250 of 2006 in case crime no. 159 of 2006 under sections 420, 467, 471 I.P.C. P.S. Hari Parbat District Agra moved on behalf of the applicant Anil Pal having  arisen out of the same incident are being disposed of by common order.

Heard Shri K.N. Raha, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of mobile with sim card in the name of another person is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel argued that there are no independent witnesses to the recovery. The learned counsel pointed out that the co-accused Vinod alias Kallu has been granted bail by the Sessions court. The learned counsel urged that mobile phone was recovered from the possession of Santo Singh but  fictitious recovery has been shown from the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicant made extortion  demand of Rs. 10 lacs. from the recovered mobile and recovery of mobile phone was made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel submitted that applicant came at the spot to recover the cash from the complainant and  notes manufactured with blank papers handed over to the applicant by the complainant were also recovered from his possession.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicant is in jail for the last about six months. In view of these facts  without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Anil Pal     indicted in case crime nos. 156 of 2006 and 159 of 2006 under sections 387 420, 467, 471, I.P.C. P.S. Hari Parbat District Agra, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19249/19250/06

15.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.