High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
U.P. Vittiya Nigam Karmchari Parishad, Kanpur And Another v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 29074 of 2006  RD-AH 16264 (18 September 2006)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J.
Hon'ble V.C.Misra, J.
According to the petitioners, they are entitled for the benefits of Vth Pay Commission w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and all consequential benefits including the arrears of the salary etc. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are employees of Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation, recommendation has been made to the State as the State is the authority of final approval. It is also contended that dearness allowance has also not been given to them from 1.1.2004. Here also, the recommendation is there with the State being authority of final approval.
Under such circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction upon the State to consider the representation of the petitioners upon giving fullest opportunity of hearing and by passing a reasoned order thereon within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. For the purpose of effective adjudication a copy of the writ petition alongwith annexures can be treated as part and parcel of such representation.
No order is passed as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.