Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VEERPAL AND OTHERS. versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Veerpal And Others. v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19553 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16267 (18 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and  learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are not named in the F.I.R.  The only evidence against them is of extra judicial confession and of last seen. There is no direct eye witness account.

Learned A.G.A. submits that the applicants are having criminal antecedents.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and without  expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicants Veer Pal,  Nanha and Prempal  involved in Case Crime No. 399 of 2006, under Sections 302 I.P.C. Police Station Aliganj, District Bareilly be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial. It shall be open to the learned  C.J.M. concerned to cancel the bail of the applicant, if it is reported otherwise by the S.O. concerned and the applicant  shall not tamper with the evidence.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.

Dt: 18.09.2006

Rcv/19553-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.