Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANSHUL SHARMA @ CHINTOO versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anshul Sharma @ Chintoo v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19711 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16436 (20 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version the alleged incident had taken place in the dark hours of night at about 9.30 p.m. It is stated that the applicant discharged shots by his country made pistol consequently, the deceased received injuries. In the  injured condition the deceased was taken to the District Hospital where he was medically examined. According to the medical examination report he was received injuries on both side upon the abdomen. The same position was in the medical examination report of J.N. Medical College Hospital.

According to the post mortem examination report  the deceased has received 6 injuries. Injury nos. 1 and 2 wee on the left forearm and right forearm. The dimension of the injury were 32 cm x 10 cm and 24 cm x 7 cm. These injuries have not been explained.

It is contended that the presence of the first informant and other witnesses are highly doubtful.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Anshul Sharma alias Chintoo  involved in case crime no. 85 of 2006  under Sections 302 I.P.C.,P.S. Delhi Gate   District Aligarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dated: 19.9.2006

NA/19711/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.