Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ASHA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Asha v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20134 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16549 (21 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Asha   indicted in case crime No. 2766  of  2006 under sections 5/6 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act   P.S. Kotwali  District Bareilly .

Heard Shri Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is a married woman with children and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The learned counsel argued that the applicant is active leader of Bahujan Samaj Party and agitates the cause of people of weaker section by organising Dharna etc. The learned counsel submitted that on the date of occurrence the friends and family members of  applicant had  assembled at her residence in the birthday party of her child.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicant was found carrying flesh trade at her residence and recovery of women and customers was made from her place.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of the both the parties and without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.      

Let the applicant Asha   indicted in case crime No. 2766  of  2006 under sections 5/6 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act   P.S. Kotwali  District Bareilly , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/20134/06

21.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.