Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PRAMOD KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. RURAL DEV. & PANCHAYATI RAJ & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Pramod Kumar v. State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Rural Dev. & Panchayati Raj & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 52801 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16609 (21 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

  Court No.10

             Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52801 of 2006                              

Pramod Kumar  . . . . .. . .. .  . .  . . . . . . . . ...  . .  .  . . . .Petitioner.

                                   Versus

State of U.P. and others. . .  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .  Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for challenging the decision dated 18.7.2006 taken by Gram Panchayat Reetaur Tehsil Bharthana district Etawah recommending the name of  Raj Kumar Yadav, respondent no.6 for grant of  fair price shop licence, on the basis of which he has been granted fair price shop licence  by Up Ziladhikari, Bharthana district Etawah.  

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the Writ Petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  competent authority shall decide the same   within eight  weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 21. 9.2006

RPP.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.