Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

IMRAN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Imran v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20299 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16781 (25 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Imran   indicted in case crime No.  417 of 2006 under sections 380 and 411  I.P.C. P.S. Barut  District Baghpat.

Heard Shri Anoop Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the recovery of three C.D. players and C.D. cassettes is said to have been made from the possession  of the applicant two days after the commission of  theft. The learned counsel argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by the watchman.

The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of  C.D. players and C.D. cassettes was made from the possession of the applicant soon after the commission of theft.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicant is in jail since 6.8.2006. The identifying marks or special  features of the stolen property have not been shown in the First Information Report. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Imran   indicted in case crime No.  417 of 2006 under sections 380 and 411  I.P.C. P.S. Barut  District Baghpat , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/20299/06

25.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.