High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Imran v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20299 of 2006  RD-AH 16781 (25 September 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Imran indicted in case crime No. 417 of 2006 under sections 380 and 411 I.P.C. P.S. Barut District Baghpat.
Heard Shri Anoop Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the recovery of three C.D. players and C.D. cassettes is said to have been made from the possession of the applicant two days after the commission of theft. The learned counsel argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by the watchman.
The learned A.G.A. argued that recovery of C.D. players and C.D. cassettes was made from the possession of the applicant soon after the commission of theft.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicant is in jail since 6.8.2006. The identifying marks or special features of the stolen property have not been shown in the First Information Report. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Imran indicted in case crime No. 417 of 2006 under sections 380 and 411 I.P.C. P.S. Barut District Baghpat , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.