Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAHEES AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rahees And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20329 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 16917 (26 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Rahees and Mohd. Hafiz indicted in case crime No. 488   of  2006  under sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 P.S Kayamaganj  District Farrukhabad  .

Heard Shri Vinod Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the house from which the recovery of slaughtered cow is said to have been made belonged to co-accused Fahim and Muien who managed their escape. The learned counsel urged that no recovery of bloodstained weapons was made from the possession of the applicants.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicants were arrested at the spot and recovery of slaughtered cow was made from their possession.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicants are not the owner of the house from which the recovery of slaughtered cow was made. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicants Rahees and Mohd. Hafiz indicted in case crime No. 488   of  2006  under sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 P.S Kayamaganj  District Farrukhabad    , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/20329/06

26.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.