Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S BANSAL TENT HOUSE THRU' ITS PROPRIETOR AND ANOTHER versus STATE OFU.P. THRU' THE CHIEF SECY. U.P. SECRETARIAT

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S Bansal Tent House Thru' Its Proprietor And Another v. State Ofu.P. Thru' The Chief Secy. U.P. Secretariat - WRIT - C No. 3269 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1696 (23 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Shishir Kumar, J.

Petitioners have approached this Court with the grievance that for the purpose of supplying certain goods on rent, have submitted a tender to the tune of Rs.15,00,000/- and the respondent no.5 to the tune of Rs.18,04,127 plus service tax which comes to Rs. 20,00,000/-. The grievance of the petitioners is that for the reasons best known to the authorities concerned, the proposal of respondent no.5 has been accepted. However, the petitioners are ready to do the work in Rs. 15,00,000/-.

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel.

As the petitioners have already submitted a representation which is contained in Annexure-5 to the writ petition, it will be appropriate that the District Magistrate be directed to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate order. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Aligarh to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within a period of seven days from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order before the respondent no.2.

A copy of the order may be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner by today itself on payment of usual charges.

23.01.2006

AHA


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.