Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GAURI SHANKER SRIVASTAVA versus SHRI RADHA KISHNA JI MAHARAJ SRI MULLOO SWAMI,B.M.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gauri Shanker Srivastava v. Shri Radha Kishna Ji Maharaj Sri Mulloo Swami,B.M. - SECOND APPEAL No. 831 of 1982 [2006] RD-AH 16963 (27 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 19

Second Appeal No. 831 of 1982

Gauri Shankar Srivastava    Vs. Sri Radha Kishnaji Maharaj Sri

   Mulloo Swami Birajman Mandir

Hon. S.P. Mehrotra, J.

Case called out in the revised list.

It appears that Civil Misc. ( Abatement ) Application No. 6327 of 1987( dated 27.10.1987) has been filed on behalf of plaintiff-respondent.

In paragraph No. 2 of the affidavit accompanying the aforesaid Abatement Application, it is , interalia, stated that Gauri Shankar Srivastava ( defendant -appellant ) expired on 5.4.1984.

In view of the above averment made in the aforesaid Abatement Application , the Court by its order dated 20.9.2006 directed the Office to submit its report as to whether any Substitution Application had been filed on behalf of the heirs and legal representatives of the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava ( defendant-appellant ) for being substituted in place of the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava ( defendant-appellant ).

Pursuant to the order dated 20.9.2006, the Office has submitted its Report dated 25.9.2006.

A perusal of the said Office Report dated 25.9.2006 shows that no Substitution Application has been filed on behalf of the heirs and legal representatives of the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava  (defendant-appellant ) for being substituted in place of the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava ( defendant-appellant).

In view of the above, the Second Appeal at the instance of the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava ( defendant-appellant ) stands abated.

As the said Gauri Shankar Srivastava was the sole defendant-appellant, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as having abated.

Dt. 27.9.2006/aks.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.