Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM PAL AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Pal And Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5738 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17019 (27 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble K.N. Ojha, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the judgment in question.

Admit.

Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 5574 of 2006.

Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of six weeks.

It is contended that appellant no.3 Pati Ram was allegedly armed with lathi. Pati Ram and Babu Ram are said to have caused ante-mortem injuries no. 3,4 and 5. It is also contended that co-accused Babu Ram has already been bailed out.

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the grant of bail mainly on the ground that ante-mortem injury no.1 was found to be grievous by the doctor.

Looking to all facts and circumstances of the case, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant no.3 (Pati Ram) only on bail during pendency of appeal.

Let the appellant No.3 (Pati Ram) be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two bonds of sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Pilibhit in S.T. No. 410 of 2004 State Vs. Ram Pal and others.

If the appellant No.3 deposits a sum of Rs.5,000/- as fine within one month  from today in the court below, the recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed against him only during pendency of appeal.

The bail prayer of appellant nos. 1 and 2 (Ram pal and Bhagwan Das) shall be considered after receipt of record in the month of December, 2006.

27.9.2006

OP/5738/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.