Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUKHVEER SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sukhveer Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20738 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17043 (27 September 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sukveer Singh   indicted in case crime No.73  of 2006 under section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act  P.S. Pisawa  District Aligarh.

Heard Shri Hemendra Pratap Singh , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the key of the room from which kerosene oil recovered was in possession of co-accused Sarnam Sharma The learned counsel argued that name of the applicant came to light from confessional statement of co-accused Sarnam Sharma. The learned counsel urged that no recovery was made from the possession or at the pointing out of the applicant.

The learned A.G.A. argued that the applicant is a fairprice dealer and he was a tenant of the room from which the recovery of kerosene oil was made.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The key of the room from which kerosene oil recovered was in  possession of co-accused Sarnam Sharma which was handed over by him to the raiding party.In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Sukveer Singh   indicted in case crime No.73  of 2006 under section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act  P.S. Pisawa  District Aligarh , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/20738/06

27.9.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.