Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARI SARAN SONI versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Hari Saran Soni v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15145 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17148 (4 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Hari Saran Soni involved in case Crime No. 596 of 2006, under section 8/22 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station Sumerpur, district Hamirpur.

Heard Sri  Vijai Bahadur Shivhare, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act was not made  by the searching official and there are no public witnesses to the recovery. According to the learned counsel the quantity of recovered smack is less than commercial quantity. The learned counsel contended that  six cases shown in the  criminal history relate to recovery of heroine or smack less than commercial quantity.

The learned AGA argued that  there is criminal history of eight cases of different nature including six cases under the NDPS Act and in case of release on bail there is every likelihood of applicant to commit other  offences of similar nature.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The quantity of recovered smack has been shown as about 10 gram in the recovery memo. The quantity of recovered smack is less than commercial quantity. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Hari Saran Soni involved in case Crime No. 596 of 2006, under section 8/22 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station Sumerpur, district Hamirpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-4.10.2006

Mahmood-15145-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.