High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Smt.Puppy And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16124 of 2006  RD-AH 17197 (4 October 2006)
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Smt. Puppy and Smt. Rajwati involved in case Crime No. 176 of 2006, under section 364-A I.P.C., Police station Tundala, district Firozabad.
Heard Sri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that according to the statement of abductee the applicants kept a vigil at him and provided food. The learned counsel argued that the applicants were not involved in the abduction nor recovery was made from their possession. According to the learned counsel no demand of ransom was made by the applicants.
The learned AGA argued that the applicants are wife and sister of co-accused Raju who had abducted the child and held him as a captive at his residence.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The applicants are women. The applicants are said to have kept vigil at the abductee and provided him food. The applicants were not involved in the abduction nor recovery was made from their custody. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicants Smt. Puppy and Smt. Rajwati involved in case Crime No. 176 of 2006, under section 364-A I.P.C., Police station Tundala, district Firozabad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.