Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIJAY @ BIJENDRA @ CHEENU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vijay @ Bijendra @ Cheenu v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16992 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17422 (9 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Vijay alias Bijendra alias Cheenu   indicted in case crime No. 492  of 2006  under sections 247, 253, 420, 34  I.P.C. read with section 3/ 4 of the Small Coins (Offence) Act, 1971 P.S. Sahani Gate  District Ghaziabad.

Heard Shri Gopal Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Sadhna Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused Vinod and Salek  who were arrested at the factory premises have been enlarged on bail by an order of this court dated 21.9.2006 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application  No. 19860 of 2006. The learned counsel submitted that after investigation the charge sheet has not been submitted under section 3/ 4 of the Small Coins (Offence) Act, 1971. The learned counsel urged that Sanjeev alias Sanjay Agarwal and Umesh Gupta are the owners of the factory from where the recoveries were made.

The learned A.G.A. argued that the applicant along with co-accused Pankaj Goyal and Sanjeev alias Sanjay Agarwal was arrested while traveling in Wagon R U.P. 14 V 5551 and recovery of two bricks manufactured by melted  coins was made from his possession.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offence under sections 247 and 253 I.P.C. are cognizable by the Magistrate !st Class. After investigation the charge sheet has not been submitted under section 3/ 4 of the Small Coins (Offence) Act, 1971.  The co-accused Vinod and Salek have been granted bail by an order of this Court. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Vijay alias Bijendra alias Cheenu   indicted in case crime No. 492  of 2006  under sections 247, 253, 420, 34  I.P.C. read with section 3/ 4 of the Small Coins (Offence) Act, 1971 P.S. Sahani Gate  District Ghaziabad , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/16992/06

9.10.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.