Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Suleman v. Amiruddin - SECOND APPEAL No. 3050 of 1981 [2006] RD-AH 17495 (10 October 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon. S.P. Mehrotra, J.

Order on

Civil Misc. Restoration / Recall Application No. 174564 of 2006.

It appears that by the order dated 28.7.2006, the Court dismissed the Second Appeal for want of prosecution on account of failure on the part of the learned counsel for the defendants-appellants to appear even when the case was taken-up in the revised list.

The aforementioned Restoration /Recall Application has been filed , interalia, praying that the said order dated 28.7.2006 , be recalled, and the Second Appeal, be restored to its original number.

The aforementioned application is supported by an affidavit, sworn on 20.8.2006

It is , interalia, stated in the said affidavit that the counsel for the appellants was busy in making arguments in some Court, therefore, he could not attend the Second Appeal when the same was taken-up on 28.7.2006; and that non- appearance of the counsel was unintentional and bonafide.

Having regard to the averments made in the aforementioned application and its accompanying affidavit, and having considered the submissions made by Sri Anjani Kumar Sinha, holding brief for Sri Syed Wajid Ali , learned counsel for the defendants-appellants and Sri Nisaruddin , learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent , I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out for non-appearance of the learned counsel for the defendants-appellants in the Second Appeal when the same was taken up by the Court on 28.7.2006.

In view of the above, the order dated 28.7.2006  is recalled, and the Second Appeal is restored to its original number.

It will be listed for hearing on 1.11.2006.

The case will not be treated as tied-up with me.

Dt. 10.10.2006

Second Appeal No. 3050 of 1981/aks.


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.