High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Jeetan Yadav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6267 of 2006  RD-AH 17831 (17 October 2006)
Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.
This appeal has been preferred by Jeetan Yadav against the judgement and order dated 20.9.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Special Judge, E.C. Act, Ghazipur in S. T. No. 636 of 2003, whereby the appellant has been found guilty and convicted under Sections 324/34, 504, 506 IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to three years and fine has also been imposed on him with default stipulation.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. and perused the impugned judgement.
Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that appellant is on interim bail from the trail Court. He has also contended that accused was also tried under Section 307 IPC but has been acquitted of the same.
The case of the co accused Subhash has been separated on the ground of his being juvenile.
In the circumstances of the case, accused shall continue on bail, during the pendeny of this appeal, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and on depositing half of the amount of fine as imposed on him and the balance amount of fine shall remain stayed during pendency of this appeal.
He shall also give an undertaking that he will not indulge in any anti social or criminal activity and shall be of good behaviour and if any report is found against him it shall be open for the Court below to report to this Court so that his bail may be cancelled.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.