Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JEETAN YADAV versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jeetan Yadav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6267 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 17831 (17 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

This appeal has been preferred by Jeetan Yadav against the judgement and order dated 20.9.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Special Judge, E.C. Act, Ghazipur in S. T. No. 636 of 2003, whereby the appellant has been found guilty and convicted under Sections 324/34, 504, 506 IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to three years and fine has also been imposed on him with default stipulation.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. and perused the impugned judgement.

Admit.

Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that appellant is on interim bail from the trail Court. He has also contended that accused was also tried under Section 307 IPC but has been acquitted of the same.

The case of the co accused Subhash has been separated on the ground of his being juvenile.

In the circumstances of the case, accused shall continue on bail, during the pendeny of this appeal, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and on depositing half of the amount of fine as imposed on him and the balance amount of fine shall remain stayed during pendency of this appeal.

He shall also give an undertaking that he will not indulge in any anti social or  criminal activity and shall be of good behaviour and if any report is found against him it shall be open for the Court below to report to this Court so that his bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 17.10.2006

RKS/6267/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.