High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Suresh Prasad Prajapati v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 56169 of 2005  RD-AH 17979 (18 October 2006)
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
The petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by Sub Divisional Officer dated 27th February, 2003, whereby the application of the petitioner has been dismissed holding that the plot in dispute is Charagah and left for public use, therefore could not have been allotted to any person and directed ejectment of the petitioner from the land in dispute, preferred revision before the Commissioner / revisional Court, who vide its order dated 26th February, 2005 maintained the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer and dismissed the revision filed by the petitioner. Thus this writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate that the orders impugned in this writ petition in any way suffer from any error, much less error apparent on the face of record, so as to warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
In view of what has been stated above, the writ petition has no force and is accordingly dismissed. However, there will be no order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.