High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Jatan & Others v. Smt. Dhanpati & Others - SECOND APPEAL No. 3033 of 1980  RD-AH 18021 (19 October 2006)
Court No. 30.
Second Appeal No. 3033 of 1980
Jatan (since deceased, died during the
pendency of suit and others ... Plaintiffs-respondents
Smt. Dhanpati and others. ... Defendants-respondents.
Hon. Sunil Ambwani, J.
Heard Sri Radhey Shyam for the petitioner. No one appears for the respondents.
This second appeal arises out of the Original Suit No. 596 of 1979 filed by plaintiff-appellants for cancellation of sale deed dated 11.10.1967 executed by Smt. Piyari the defendant no. 3 in favour of defendants 1 and 2. The suit was dismissed by the trial court on 30.5.1989. The civil appeal no. 249 of 1978 was partly allowed on 31.7.1980, declaring that Smt. Piyari, the defendant no. 3, who was widow of Faujdar, had 1/8 share in the land. She, therefore, could not have sold 1/6 share and thus the sale deed dated 11.10.1968 to the extent of 1/4th share was cancelled.
Sri Radhey Shyam learned counsel for the appellant submits that both the courts below have wrongly disbelieved the documents electoral roll entry; the copy of the death register, and kutumb register showing that Smt. Piyari was wife of Shri Asharfi before she married Shri Faujdar. He submits that as the co-tenure holder the plaintiff continued to be in joint possession and had got the land by survivor-ship under section 175 of the U.P. Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
Both the courts have concurrently held that Smt. Piyari was wife of Shri Faujdar. The documents filed in evidence were prepared during the period when the suit was filed. The
evidence of DW-5, the daughter of Smt. Piyari and DW-1, the son in law of Smt. Piyari, established that she was the wife of Shri Faujdar and had inherited 1/8th share in the land in suit.
With regard to transfer of sirdari land, the appellate court rightly held that the transfer could only the challenged by the Gaon Sabha and not a co-tenure holder. The sale would be voidable only at the instance of Goan Sabha. The co-tenure holder shall not get any right under section 175 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Holdings Act, 1950, as such the right would be inherited by the co-tenants by survivorship only on the death of the other tenure holder.
I do not find that the judgment of the court below raise any question of law, much less a substantial question of law to be decided by the Court
The second appeal and the cross objections are consequently dismissed with costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.