Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

FOOLMATI AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Foolmati And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 57643 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18078 (26 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.10

             Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 57643 of 2006                        

Foolmati and others .  . . .  .. . . . . .  ... . . . . . . . ...  . .  .  . .Petitioners.

                                   Versus

State of U.P. and others. . .  . . . . .  . . . .  . . .  . .  . . . .  .   Respondents.

        ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This  is a writ petition for a direction to the respondent authorities   to get expeditious inquiry done with regard to so called forged entries made  in respect of plot no. 600 (Old) and 644 (New) situated in village Sandawan Majra Vidawan Tehsil  Manjhanpur district Kaushambi and also to restrain respondent no.5 to  make construction over the above disputed plot.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned  Standing Counsel for the  respondents.

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to file a fresh and comprehensive representation along with certified copy of this order as well as complete copy of  the writ petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within three weeks from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned  competent authority shall decide the same   within twelve weeks of the receipt of the representation as contemplated  above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy after hearing the parties concerned without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgment since this court has not entered into merits of the present case.

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Dated: 26.10.2006

RPP


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.