Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DEVASHISH CHAKRAVARTI versus IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Devashish Chakravarti v. Iind Additional District Judge, Varanasi And Another - WRIT - A No. 58852 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18165 (27 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

   Court no. 7                                                        

         Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 58852 of 2006

Devashish Chakravarti        versus     IInd Addl. District Judge,Varanasi

                                                           and another.

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari,J.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the landlord of house/shop no. D33/3 situate in Mohalla Khalispura Ward Dashwamegh District Varanasi. The aforesaid shop was declared vacant vide order dated 27.6.2005 by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer.

Aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 27.6.2005 respondent no.2 preferred revision before the District Judge, Varanasi.

It appears that the revisionist after filing of the revision has taken   7 adjournments on payment of Rs.50/-, 60/- and 100/- cost.  It also appears from the order-sheet (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) that the court below is not interested in deciding the matter. There is limit for granting adjournments. Maximum three adjournments may be granted.

The only prayer of the counsel for the petitioner at this stage is that respondent no.1, IInd Addl. District Judge, Varanasi may be directed to decide the revision at the earliest.

After going through the order-sheet appended Annexure-1 to the writ petition I am of the opinion that this is a fit case in which such direction can be given for deciding the revision at the earliest.

In the circumstances, IInd Addl.District Judge, Varanasi is directed to decide the Rent Control Revision No. 58 of 2005, Sudhir Kumar vs. Devashish Chakravarti by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Dated 27.10.2006

CPP/-

           

 


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.