Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

INDRA DEVO & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Indra Devo & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6439 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18228 (28 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

This appeal has been preferred by Indra Devo and Smt. Artee who are father and mother in laws of the deceased against the judgement and order dated 11.10.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 5, Deoria in S. T. No. 173 of 2002 whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 304-B/34, 498-A/34 and Section 4 of D.P. Act and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and fine has also been imposed on them with default stipulation.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgement.

Admit.

Learned counsel for the appellants has contended that the deceased committed suicide and the marriage had taken place about 7-8 years earlier. He has also contended that prosecution witnesses no. 1 and 2 had turned hostile and did not state about the demand of dowry. However the testimony of other two witnesses who had stated that Golden Chain was being demanded by the accused persons has not been proved.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merits of the case, appellants be released on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. The fine as imposed under Section 304 IPC shall remain stayed during pendency of this appeal and the fine imposed in other Sections shall be paid by the appellants.

Dated: 28.10.2006

RKS/6439/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.