High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
Kailash Chandra v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22654 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18236 (28 October 2006)
|
Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.
This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Kailash Chandra involved in case Crime No. 19 of 2006, under section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station G.R.P. Orai, district Jalaun.
Heard Sri D.D. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that compliance of mandatory provisions of NDPS Act was not made and there are no public witnesses to the recovery. The learned counsel urged that there is no criminal history of the applicant.
The learned AGA submitted that recovery of ganja more than small quantity was made from the possession of the applicant.
I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.
The quantity of recovered ganja being less than the commercial quantity, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Kailash Chandra involved in case Crime No. 19 of 2006, under section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police station G.R.P. Orai, district Jalaun, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
D/- 28.10.2006
Mahmood-22654-06
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.