Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PAWAN KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Pawan Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23158 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18347 (30 October 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. The allegled occurrence had taken place on 26.6.2006 at about 3.00 a.m. Its F.I.R. was lodged on the same day at 4.30 a.m. It has been specifically mentioned in the F.I.R. that 3 persons received injuries in the said incident  and one of the injured Mamraj has disclosed the facts to the first informant, thereafter, the F.I.R. was lodged, but subsequently,  Smt Safalata succumbed to injuries, but during investigation on 17.7.2006 the affidavits have been filed by the witnesses  and their statements were recorded on 10.8.2006 in which the name of the applicant and other accused persons have been disclosed . Co-accused Sompal, whose case is on the same footing with the case of the applicant, has been released on bail by this court on 22.9.2006 in Criminal Misc Case No. 19701 of 2006.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without  expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.  

Let the applicant  Pawan Kumar involved in Case Crime No. 1458 of 2006, under Sections 304 and 326 I.P.C., Police Station Najibabad     District  Bijnor  be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two  sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dt: 30.10.2006

Rcv/ 23158-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.