Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHIT TYAGI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohit Tyagi v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 59513 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18442 (1 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The petitioner passed High School Examination in the year 2002 in which his father's name has been shown as Shridhar Prasad whereas it should be Krishna Kant Tyagi. With regard to this, the petitioner filed an application on 17.7.2004 for correction of his father's name. Such application was filed before the respondent no. 3, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-5 to this writ petition. Even when no orders were passed on the said application, the petitioner filed reminder on 12.5.2006 but yet the respondent no. 3, the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Local Office, Meerut, U.P. has not taken any decision with regard to the same.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the respondent no. 3, the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Local Office, Meerut, U.P. alongwith a certified copy of this order as well as photo stat copy of the initial application filed on 17.7.2004, the said application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, by a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Dt/-1.11.2006

p.s.

w.p.59513.06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.