Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM AWATAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Awatar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22711 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18466 (1 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ram Awatar involved in case Crime No. 337 of 2006, under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Nigohi, district Shahjahanpur.

Heard Sri Radhey Shyam Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that two cases have been shown against the applicant in the gang chart and the applicant is on bail in both the cases.

The learned AGA argued that  there is a case under section 302 I.P.C. against the applicant, therefore, there is every likelihood of his indulging in other offences after grant of bail.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The applicant having been  enlarged on bail in both the cases shown in the gang chart, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Ram Awatar involved in case Crime No. 337 of 2006, under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Nigohi, district Shahjahanpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and an undertaking that he will not misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in the commission of crime or anti social activities after being released on bail.

D/- 1.11.2006

Mahmood-22711-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.