High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
The Commissioner Trade Tax, U.P. Lucknow v. M/S Lalman Roshan Lal - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. 2943 of 2004  RD-AH 18513 (1 November 2006)
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.
Question raised is about the demand of interest under Section 8 (1) of the Act. The Tribunal has deleted the demand on the amount that at no stage, tax on the export to Nepal has been admitted and thus, tax assessed cannot be treated as admitted tax. The perusal of order of the Tribunal reveals that the dealer claimed export to Nepal for Rs.4,88,444.81 out of which, claim for Rs.1,59,524.71 was rejected. In the circumstances, the tax assessed, cannot be treated as admitted tax, inasmuch as, dealer was all along contested the levy of tax. No question of law is involved in the present revision.
In the result, revision fails, and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.