Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIRENDRA @ SITU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Virendra @ Situ v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 14058 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18525 (1 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Virendra alias Situ  indicted in case crime No. 17  of 2006  under sections 392, 411  I.P.C. P.S. Kasna  District Gautam Budh Nagar .

Heard Shri Gaurav Kumar Srivastava, and Shri Neeraj Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused Krishna alias Kripal is a contractor and complainant is a Assistant Manager in Greater Noida Authority. The learned counsel urged that there has been dispute between them and the co-accused Krishna alias Kripal was called by the complainant. The learned counsel submitted that the applicant is the friend of co-accused Krishna alias Kripal. The learned counsel argued that there has been heated exchange between the co-accused Krishna alias Kripal and the complainant which resulted in their false implication in the present case. The learned counsel urged that no recovery of looted  gold chain, mobile phone and finger ring was made from the possession of the applicant. The learned counsel pointed out that the applicant is in jail since 23.1.2006.

The learned A.G.A. argued that the applicant along with co-accused  was arrested at the spot and recovery of looted car was made from their possession soon after the commission of robbery.    

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

 The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. The applicant is in jail for the last about ten months. There is no criminal history of the applicant. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Virendra alias Situ  indicted in case crime No. 17  of 2006  under sections 392, 411  I.P.C. P.S. Kasna  District Gautam Budh Nagar , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/14058/06

1.11.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.