Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DILIP KUMAR SONKAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dilip Kumar Sonkar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22831 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18626 (3 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Dilip Kumar Sonkar involved in case Crime No. 86 of 2005, under section 2/3  of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Hathgaon, district Fatehpur.

Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in the gang chart two cases have been show against the applicant out of which he has been acquitted in S.T. No. 19 of 2005 and S.T. No. 20 of 2005 and in case Crime No. 51 of 2005 he is on bail.

The learned AGA submitted that the applicant is a man of criminal antecedents and there is likelihood of indulging in the commission of other offences after being released on bail.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The applicant having been acquitted in the case under section 307 I.P.C. and being on bail for the offence under section 302, I consider it to be a fit case for bail. .

Let the applicant Dilip Kumar Sonkar involved in case Crime No. 86 of 2005, under section 2/3  of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Hathgaon, district Fatehpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and an undertaking that he will not misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in the commission of crime or anti social activities after being released on bail.

D/- 3.11.2006

Mahmood-22831-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.