Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raju v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22840 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18654 (3 November 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Raju involved in case Crime No. 156 of 2006, under sections 379, 411, I.P.C. and section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Aurangabad, district Bulandshahar.

Heard Sri V.S. Rajpoot, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery of stolen motorcycle was made from the joint possession of the applicant and two co-accused. The learned counsel argued that  there is no criminal history of the applicant. According to the learned counsel there are no public witnesses to the recovery.

The learned AGA submitted that the applicant was captured at the spot and recovery of stolen motorcycle was made from his possession whereas others managed their escape.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The offences are triable by the Magistrate Ist class. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is in jail for the last two months. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Raju involved in case Crime No. 156 of 2006, under sections 379, 411, I.P.C. and section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Aurangabad, district Bulandshahar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and an undertaking that he will not misuse the liberty of bail by indulging in the commission of crime or anti social activities after being released on bail.

D/- 3.11.2006

Mahmood-22840-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.