SACHIN VERMA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Sachin Verma v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22822 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 18664 (3 November 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Sachin Verma involved in case Crime No. 226 of 2002, under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Mandi, district Saharanpur.

Heard Sri N. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was declared juvenile and an application had been moved for transferring his case to the Juvenile Board. The learned counsel urged that the applicant was under the impression that his case would be transferred to the Juvenile Court. The learned counsel contended that the applicant came to know after issuance of non-bailable warrant that his application for transferring the case was rejected.

The learned AGA submitted that the applicant remained absent for a period of eleven months and misused the liberty of bail.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The certified copy of the order-sheet produced by the learned counsel for the applicant indicates that the application for transferring the case to Juvenile Board was moved on behalf of the applicant and after rejection of the said application non bailable warrant was issued. The applicant is in jail since 19.6.2006. Taking an over all view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Sachin Verma involved in case Crime No. 226 of 2002, under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police station Mandi, district Saharanpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and an undertaking that he will regularly attend the proceedings/trial of case Crime No. 226 of 2002. In case of any lapse on the part of the applicant the trial court would be at liberty to cancel his bail.

D/- 3.11.2006

Mahmood-22822-06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.